---

[Back to Home Page] 

- 1 -

Hazrat Sb has proven that no new Ilham is possible so Holy Prophet is Last of the Rusul

It is impossible and improbable that the true principles of Quran can be changed or modified. So it is also illogical and impossible for the darkness of shirk to prevail all over the creation. Now the item that is consequence of an impossible event is also impossible in itself. Hence it is proved that the Holy Prophet pbuh is factually the Khatam-ur-Rusul. (Brahin-e-Ahmadia, pg103, 1880)

- 2 -

Hazrat Sb has beautifully proved that no prophet can come after Holy Prophet

The Quran does not sanction the advent of any prophet after the arrival of the Prophet Muhammad(SAW) whether he is a new one or old one.  All the knowledge that a prophet possesses is taught by the angel Gabriel and the door of Gabriel's descent to impact the revelations of prophethood is closed for ever.  How can a prophet come now without having access to the revelations of prophethood. (Izalat-ul-Auham, Page 511 RK761 1891)

- 3 -

Hazrat Sb explains the meaning of ayah خاتم النبین and proves that no prophet can come after Holy Prophet

Every sensible person can understand if Allah is true in His promise and the promise that is given in ayah khatam-un-nabiyyin and explicitly explained in ahadith that now after deat of Holy Prophet pbuh Gabriel has been forbidden forever to bring the wahi of nubuwwat. If all these statements are correct and true then no person can ever come as a prophet after our prophet sws. (Izala-e-Auham pg 577, 1891)

- 4 -

Hazrat Sb further explains the meaning of ayah خاتم النبین

In order to be a prophet it is essential to get religious knowledge through angel Gabriel (as) and it has been proven that wahi for prophets has been discontinued till the day of judgment. (Izala-e-Auham pg 614, 1891)

- 5 -

Hazrat Sb has given wonderful translation of ayah  و لکن رسول اللہ و خاتم النبین

The ayah is that ما کان محمد ابا احد من رجالکم و لکن رسول اللہ و خاتم النبین that is Muhammad pbuh is not the father of any of your men but he is messenger of Allah and last of the prophets. This ayah is also making it clear that no prophet will come after our prophet sws. (Izala-e-Auham pg 614, 1891)

 

- 6 -

Hazrat Sb has beautifully explained ayah خاتم النبین with the hadith لا نبی بعدی 

ما کان محمد ابا احد من رجالکم و لکن رسول اللہ و خاتم النبین Are you not aware that the Munificent and High Lord bestowed upon our Holy Prophet pbuh the name of Khatam-un-Nabiyyin without any exception and our Prophet pbuh explained it clearly by saying, ‘No prophet will come after me’, for the benefit of the skeptics. If we permit the advent of a prophet after our Holy Prophet pbuh as lawful, it is tantamount to regarding as lawful the opening of the office of prophethood when once it has been closed and this is as clearly believed by every Muslim is wrong. How can a prophet succeed our Prophet pbuh when the chain of revelation came to an end with his death and God sealed the line of the prophets in him pbuh. (Hamamat-ul-Bushra, P. 20 RK 200; 1889)

 

- 7 -

Hazrat Sb has explained that claimant of prophethood is out of pale of Islam and Kafir

Why should I claim nabuwwat to get out of pale of Islam and be a part of group of kafirs. (Hamamat-ul-Bushra, P. 79 RK 297; 1889)

 

- 8 -

Hazrat Sb has beautifully explained his beliefs are exactly same as sunnis and Ahmadis consider any claimant of prophethood as IMPOSTOR and KAFIR

I am not a claimant of prophethood nor I deny miracles, angels, lailat-ul-qadr etc. I believe in all the items of faith as prescribed by the Sunni School of Islam and I accept everything that is according to the Quran and Hadith.  I fully subscribe to the doctrine that Muhammad is the last of all Prophets, and that any claimant to Prophethood after him is an impostor and a Kafir.  It is my belief that the revelations of Prophethood started with Adam and closed with the prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). (Majmuha-Estaharet, P. 230-231; Tabligh-i-Risalat, Vol 2, Page 20 October, 2, 1891.)

 

- 9 -

Hazrat Sb has responded to ignorant mullahs who think Ahmadis believe in new prophets

And Nazeer Hussain has written a fatwa of kufr and dishonesty about this humble-self with great persistence and belief. And  has named (me) as Dajjal, Stray and Kafir. I have explained about these allegations again and again and informed the meaning of my books that there is no word of kufr in those. Neither I claim prophethood and expulsion from ummah nor do I deny miracles, angels or laiala-tul-qadr. And I believe in the Holy Prophet sw being the khatam-un-nabiyyin and know it with full conviction and have sound belief in the fact that our Prophet sws is Khatam-ul-anbiya and after him no prophet will come for this ummah, be it a new prophet or old. (Nishan-e-Asmani, pg 30, 1892)

 The ignorant Mullahs should read this golden wordings of Hazrat Sb and have some shame:

آنحضرت ﷺ کے خاتم النبین ہونیکا قایل اور یقین کامل سے جانتا ہوں اور اس بات پر محکم ایمان رکھتا ہوں کہ ہمارے نبی صلعم خاتم الانبیا ہیں اور آنجناب کے بعد اس امت کے لیے کوی نبی نہیں آییگا نیا ہو یا پرانا ہو۔

 

- 10 -

Hazrat Sb has asked to corrected if the word Nabi is written anywhre by mistake

Instead of the word "NABI', please consider the word "MUHADDIS" everywhere and strike off that word (i.e., prophet) (Majmuha-Estaharet, P. 314; 1892)

- 11 -

Hazrat Sb has clearly explained claimant of prophethood is a fitna

It is not appropriate for Allah to send a nabi after our nabi Khatam-u-Nabbiyyin. And it is not appropriate to start prophethood again after discontinuing it and cancel some orders of Quran and increase on them and dishonor his promise and forget to accomplish it and start fitnas in our religion. (Aina’Kamalat-e-Islam , pg 377, 1893)

- 12 -

Hazrat Sb has beautifully defined that only way to be a Muslim is to deny any prophet after Holy Prophet

If the writer's first view is correct that I am a Muslim and believe in Quran then his second opinion is wrong that I am a claimant of prophethood. And if the second view is correct then first is incorrect that says I am a Muslim and believe in Quran. Can a such a slanderer liar who claims to be a prophet and rasool have belief in Quran? And can such a person, who believes in Quran and considers ayah و لکن رسول اللہ و خاتم النبین as the word of God, say that I am also a prophet and rasool after Holy Prophet? (Anjam-e-Atham, pg 26, 1897) 

 

- 13 -

Hazrat Sb has beautifully explained again after 6 years his beliefs are same as sunnis and Ahmadis consider any claimant of prophethood as MALOON

We have written many times that this unwise Nazeer Hussain and his disobedient disciple Muhammad Hussain have made a total lie against us that we deny the miracles of prophets or that we have claimed ourself for prophethood. Or God forbid, we don’t believe Hazrat Muhammad sws to be the last of prophets. Or deny angels or day of judgement etc., the principle beliefs of islam. (Anjam-e-Atham, pg 45, 1897)
 

- 14 -

Hazrat Sb has clarified that he does not claim prophethood and sends LA'NAT on such claimant

Yes, this is right and correct that if Maulvi Ghulam Dastageer wants an immediate divine punishment on the kafir and liar debating with the maumin and truthful, then it is well said. Let him send on us his immediate divine punishment. His statement is not correct (factual) that, “I am not a claimant of prophethood that I should arrange for immediate azaab” he should be made clear that we also send laánat on the claimant of prophethood and believe in لا الھ الا اللہ محمد رسول اللھ and believe in finality of prophethood of Holy Prophet pbuh. (Majmuha-Estaharet, Vol 2, P. 297, 1897)

- 15 -

Such a beautiful writing by Hazrat Sb explaining no prophet will come because Hadith لا نبی بعدی is 100% authentic and Quran also proves it

Holy prophet pbuh has informed again and again that no prophet will come after me and hadith la nabiyya ba’adi is so famous that no one can doubt its authenticity and Quran whose each and every word is final testifies it through its ayah و لکن رسول اللہ و خاتم النبین that in fact prophet hood has ended on our prophet (pbuh). (Kitab-ul-Barriya, pg 217-218, 1898)

 

- 16 -

Hazrat Sb reconfirms in 1899 that Hadith لا نبی بعدی means not any kind of prophet can come

The fact that our prophet sws is Khatam-ul-Anbiya requires the death of Hazrat Issa as. Because, if any prophet comes after him then he cannot be stated as Khatam-ul-Anbiya, nor the prophetic revelation can be considered to be ended.  (Ayam-ul-Sulh, pg 146, 1899)

 To differentiate between new or old prophet is a mischief, this differentiation is neither present in Hadith nor in Quran. And hadith لا نبی بعدی depicts general negation. So what a courage, audacity and sacrilege is it to follow foul thinking and deliberately leave clear proofs of Quran and believe in coming of a prophet after the Last of the Prophets. And to start the course of prophetic revelation after its curtailment. (Ayam-ul-Sulh, pg 147, 1899)

The ignorant Mullahs shoudl read the divine wording of Hazrat Sb:

حدیث لا نبی بعدی میں بھی نفی عام ہے

How shameful to put allegation on Hazrat Sb to believe in any kind of prophethood. Read it again O Mullahs:

وحی نبوت منقطع ہو چکی

- 16 -

Hazrat Sb has cleared all blames on him just a year before his death

This is also an allegation on me that I claim prophethood or that I have made a new religion or separate qibla or Namaz or Quran. So against such a false allegation what should I say other than may Allah's curse be on the liars. (Mulfoozat Vol 10 420 1908)

How shameful for Mullahs who consider Ahmadis to believe in prohpethood of Hazrat Sb. All Ahmadis say with their full belief to those who say that Hazrat Mirza was a prophet or claimed to be a prophet:

لعنۃ اللہ علی الکاذبین